1Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington
2Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Olympia,
Washington
3Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington
4Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health,
University of Texas, Galveston, Texas
5Department of Medicine, University of California at San
Francisco, San Francisco, California
6Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham,
Birmingham, Alabama
7Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo
Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
8Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Coopers
Plains, Queensland, Australia
9Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota and Abbott
Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
10Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
11Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.
Key words: biological markers, diagnosis, environmental exposure, hexachlorobenzene, laboratory, lead, metals, multiple chemical sensitivity, occupational exposure, porphyria, porphyrins
Manuscript received 8 July 1996; manuscript accepted 29 August 1996.
The authors wish to extend their sincere gratitude to Ellen K. Silbergeld, University of Maryland, for her thoughtful, critical review of this article during its preparation. Statements made in this article do not necessarily represent Dr. Silbergeld's opinions. This article was adapted from the Working Document: Evaluation of Individuals with Environmental Chemical Exposures and Suspected Abnormalities of Heme Synthesis (11 February 1996), which was prepared through the Office of the Medical Director at the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Olympia, Washington. A statement of potential conflicts of interest was included with this article at the time it was submitted for consideration by this journal.
Address correspondence to Dr. W.E. Daniell, Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington, Box 357234, Seattle, WA 98195-7234. Telephone: (206) 685-3160. Fax: (206) 543-8123. E-mail: bdaniell@u.washington.edu
Abbreviations used: ADP, ALA-D deficiency porphyria; AIP, acute intermittent porphyria; ALA,-aminolevulinic acid; ALA-D, ALA dehydratase; CEP, congenital erythropoietic porphyria; CHP, chronic hepatic porphyria; Copro-O, coproporphyrinogen oxidase; 2,4-D, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; EPP, erythropoietic protoporphyria; FEP, free erythrocyte protoporphyrin; HCB, hexachlorobenzene; HCP, hereditary coproporphyria; HEP, hepatoerythropoietic porphyria; MCS, multiple chemical sensitivity (syndrome); PBB(s), polybrominated biphenyl(s); PBG, porphobilinogen; PCB(s), polychlorinated biphenyl(s); PCT, porphyria cutanea tarda; 2,4,5-T, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid; TCDD(s), tetrachlorodibenzodioxin(s); Uro-D, uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase; VP, variegate porphyria; ZPP, zinc protoporphyrin.
Figure 1. Heme Biosynthesis Pathway. Numbers designate individual enzyme-catalyzed steps of heme biosynthesis. Enzyme name, step 1, ALA synthase; step 2, ALA dehydratase; step 3, PBG deaminase (uroporphyrinogen synthase); step 4, uroporphyrinogen-III cosynthase; step 5, uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase; step 6, coproporphyrinogen oxidase; step 7, protoporphyrinogen oxidase; step 8, ferrochelatase. aALA is synthesized within mitochondria in step 1 and then traverses to cytoplasm, where step 2 occurs. Coproporphyrinogen III is synthesized in cytoplasm in step 5 and then traverses into mitochondria, where step 6 occurs. bIntermediate precursors not shown for step 5 (7-, 6-, and 5-carboxyl porphyrinogens) or step 6 (3-carboxyl porphyrinogen). cAlternative pathway at step 4 (hydroxymethylbilane to uroporphyrinogen I) is not enzymatically catalyzed.Porphyrias are relatively uncommon conditions but are probably underrecognized. The prevalence of genetic predisposition to porphyria probably has been underestimated in the general population because of the limited availability of clinical tests for specific heme-synthesis enzymes and because prevalence studies generally have focused more on family members of affected individuals and less on the general population. The symptomatic manifestations of porphyria, particularly the noncutaneous manifestations, are often nonspecific and may not be accompanied by supporting physical signs. Most clinicians encounter and recognize few if any cases of porphyria in the course of their careers, and in general their levels of suspicion for these conditions are low; yet diagnosis of porphyria is critically dependent on the clinician first suspecting it as a possible cause of a patient's symptoms and then ordering the specific essential diagnostic tests.
Some of the inherited porphyrias occur commonly as toxicogenetic conditions, where the genetically acquired trait is clinically latent until clinical manifestations of porphyria are triggered idiosyncratically by exposure to certain therapeutic drugs, chemicals, or alcohol. Porphyria also can occur as an acquired toxin-induced condition, where biochemical and clinical manifestations of the porphyria are actually caused by exposure to certain chemicals in individuals with no evident genetic predisposition. In addition, certain chemicals can produce disturbances of heme synthesis that are associated with alterations of subcellular structure and functions and characteristic changes in patterns of heme-precursor excretion. These measurable changes offer potential biological markers for detecting harmful effects of specific chemical exposures while their biological effects are still preclinical and potentially reversible. Most clinicians, however, including specialists in occupational and environmental medicine, are relatively uninformed about these phenomena.
It has recently been proposed that a variety of chemical-associated illnesses for which there are no widely accepted specific diagnostic tests or etiologic explanations--such as multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) syndrome, Persian Gulf War illnesses, conditions associated with silicone breast implants, and various fatigue syndromes--may represent either mild chronic cases of porphyria, or, at least in part, manifestations of acquired abnormalities in heme synthesis. Although diagnoses of porphyria and porphyrialike conditions in such cases are commonly dismissed by other clinicians and researchers, these diagnoses are increasingly put forth as objective justification for recommending major lifestyle modifications and therapeutic interventions in individual cases.
This article reviews pertinent medical and scientific literature in order to provide a foundation to address current issues related to environmental chemical exposures and possible disturbances of heme synthesis. The first three sections of this review provide necessary background information about heme synthesis and the classification and biochemistry of porphyria; more detailed information is available in the cited general references (1-10).
Heme, or iron-protoporphyrin IX, is produced by a metabolic pathway that involves eight enzyme-controlled steps (see below and Figure 1).
Porphyrias historically have been classified in various ways (see Table 1), including: specific enzyme(s) principally involved; nature of underlying inherited defect, if any (autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, acquired); principal origin(s) of the excess heme precursors (hepatic, erythropoietic, mixed); usual temporal pattern of symptomatic manifestations (acute or chronic); and principal nature of symptomatic manifestations (neurologic, neurocutaneous, cutaneous). These classifications overlap and are not mutually exclusive.
Porphyrias with Neurologic Manifestations
Symptoms in the neurologic porphyrias [ALA dehydratase (ALA-D) deficiency
porphyria (ADP) and acute intermittent porphyria (AIP)] and noncutaneous
symptoms in the neurocutaneous porphyrias [hereditary coproporphyria (HCP)
and variegate porphyria (VP)] tend to occur in intermittent acute attacks,
with variable degrees of symptom presence between attacks. Clinical onset
of the neurologic and neurocutaneous porphyrias usually occurs in postpubertal
adolescents or adults; attacks are more common in women than men. Only
six cases of ADP have been reported (7). AIP is one of the more prevalent
types of clinically manifested porphyria, at least in the United States.
All the neurologic and neurocutaneous porphyrias (except ADP) are classified as hepatic porphyrias because the liver is a principal site in which the enzyme deficiency manifests itself biochemically. Liver function abnormalities are common but are generally mild or moderate (12). Several studies have indicated that individuals with AIP are at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (13-15). The principal site of enzyme expression has not been identified clearly for the small number of patients reported to have ADP.
The neurologic manifestations of acute attacks are indistinguishable for the various neurologic and neurocutaneous porphyrias, and these conditions are differentiated by biochemical or genetic testing. The principal manifestations reflect broad dysfunction of the nervous system. Frequent symptoms include: abdominal pain, constipation, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, hypertension, fever (i.e., autonomic nervous system); weakness, back and extremity pains, localized or extensive pareses or paralysis, paresthesias, hypoesthesias (i.e., peripheral nervous system); and psychiatric or behavioral symptoms (i.e., central nervous system). Hyponatremia may reflect inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (i.e., hypothalamus). The intensity of symptoms, particularly pain, can be severe; associated physical signs, however, are commonly either absent or disproportionately less intense. Symptoms are generally less severe in HCP (7).
Most individuals who possess the genetic defect associated with one of the neurologic or neurocutaneous porphyrias show no recognizable clinical manifestations of porphyria throughout their lives. Only about 10% of individuals genetically predisposed to AIP or VP, and probably no more than one-third of those predisposed to HCP, ever develop the characteristic attacks of acute symptoms (4,7,16-18). If and when symptoms develop in a genetically predisposed individual, the initial onset and any subsequent recurrences often are linked to precipitating factors such as use of a therapeutic drug, exposure to a provocative chemical, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, an infection, the menstrual cycle, or fasting (1).
The frequency and severity of symptom attacks vary widely both among and within individuals. In most cases, symptom attacks have discernible onsets, are characterized by moderate or severe pain, last several days or longer (up to weeks or months), and are followed or separated by periods of clinical remission. Attacks are usually recurrent but not necessarily (18). Some manifestations of acute attacks can persist after the other clinical and biochemical manifestations subside or resolve; this is particularly true for peripheral motor neuropathy, which can take up to 1 year to resolve or can become permanent (19,20). Permanent neurological deficits are not necessarily accompanied by heme precursor abnormalities when a patient's porphyria is otherwise in remission.
In contrast to the typical acute presentation, symptoms in some cases can occur nondistinctly in time and/or be relatively mild and some symptoms, particularly pain or psychiatric manifestations, can become chronic, often with variable severity over time (7,9,21). Given such complex presentations as well as the frequent paucity of physical signs, the diagnosis of porphyria can be delayed or missed entirely. Accordingly, screening surveys of psychiatric inpatients have reported a relatively high prevalence of individuals with previously unrecognized porphyria (22-24). One recent study, however, found no significant increase in major psychiatric illness among 344 consecutive patients with AIP (25).
Porphyrias with Neurologic and/or Cutaneous Manifestations
The neurocutaneous porphyrias, VP and HCP, can manifest cutaneous lesions
as well as acute noncutaneous symptom attacks. One review of 110 cases
of HCP reported that 30% experienced acute photosensitive responses, usually
in association with acute symptom attacks (16). In contrast, acute photosensitivity
is not common in VP; the cutaneous lesions tend to be chronic and they
occur more often in individuals who do not have acute symptom attacks than
in those who do (26,27). The cutaneous lesions of VP are particularly common
in hot climates--about 75% in a series of South African patients with clinically
active VP (27). The cutaneous lesions of VP and chronic cutaneous lesions
of HCP cannot be distinguished clinically or histologically from PCT (see
below).
Porphyrias with Cutaneous Manifestations
The cutaneous porphyrias include all the porphyrias classified as erythropoietic
[congenital erythropoietic porphyria (CEP), hepatoerythropoietic porphyria
(HEP), and erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP)] plus the nonerythropoietic
porphyria PCT. The hereditary and acquired forms of PCT usually manifest
first in adulthood, whereas clinical onset of the erythropoietic porphyrias
usually occurs in infancy or childhood. There is no gender predilection
in PCT, although in the past it has tended to occur more often in men.
The erythropoietic porphyrias are relatively uncommon: fewer than 200 cases
of CEP and fewer than 20 cases of HEP have been reported (7,28,29).
The cutaneous manifestations of CEP, PCT, and HEP (and VP and HCP) can be difficult to distinguish on the basis of clinical or histologic appearance, although the lesions of the autosomal recessive conditions, CEP and HEP, are usually more severe. Cutaneous manifestations include: skin fragility, vesiculobullous skin eruptions evolving into crusted ulcers, and residual hyperpigmentation or scarring, primarily occurring in sun-exposed areas of the body (7,30). Facial hypertrichosis is also common. The pattern of EPP differs substantially and is generally less severe than in the other cutaneous porphyrias; it is characterized by acute photosensitivity manifesting as pain, pruritus, and erythema with exposure as short as minutes, and generally without vesiculobullous lesions or scarring unless sun exposure is prolonged (30,31). Liver injury is usually not found with the cutaneous porphyrias other than in some patients with EPP, in which case it can be severe and potentially fatal.
Porphyria Cutanea Tarda
Porphyria cutanea tarda is one of the most prevalent types of porphyria;
it occurs more often as a sporadic condition than as a familial inherited
condition. The genetic defect associated with the familial form is inherited
in autosomal-dominant manner. Hepatic uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase (Uro-D)
activity is decreased in all forms of PCT; erythrocyte Uro-D activity,
however, is normal in the sporadic form but is decreased in all but a small
subgroup of familial cases (32). The sporadic and familial forms of PCT
usually occur in association with exogenous factors such as alcohol, oral
estrogens, iron, and certain chemicals, or with certain medical conditions,
particularly liver diseases; both are successfully treated in the same
manner (2,7). Familial PCT, therefore, can be regarded at least partially
as an acquired condition in which the inherited enzyme deficiency may only
increase an individual's susceptibility to disease (33).
PCT is usually associated with some degree of liver abnormality (2,3,8). Liver function tests are nearly always abnormal to some degree. Moderate siderosis and various degrees of fibrosis or necrosis are often found upon biopsy, and cirrhosis develops in a small proportion of patients. It is common for PCT to develop in individuals with preexisting liver disease of a variety of types, particularly alcoholic liver disease or chronic hepatitis C (34-38). Patients with chronic liver disease also can develop mild or moderate degrees of porphyrinuria (increased urine porphyrins) in biochemical patterns that can be consistent with PCT but without associated cutaneous lesions (see "Chronic Hepatic Porphyria") (2,39). Patients with PCT are reported to be at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (13,40-42); conversely, some benign or malignant liver tumors can overproduce uroporphyrin and induce PCT (43-45).
In general, the neurologic (and neurocutaneous) porphyrias are characterized by excessive excretion of the porphyrinogen precursors, ALA and PBG, in urine; the cutaneous (and neurocutaneous) porphyrias are characterized by the accumulation of porphyrins in blood and excessive excretion of porphyrins in urine and/or stool (46,52-54). Individual types of porphyria can be differentiated by the pattern of heme precursors (i.e., the absolute values and the ratios to each other) in a patient's urine, blood, and stool, if collected either during or soon after attacks of neurologic symptoms or while porphyric skin lesions are actively manifested. Excretion of ALA and PBG in urine usually normalizes within several weeks following an acute attack in VP or HCP (16,26,27); in AIP, urine excretion commonly subsides but might not completely normalize during remissions (19,20). Compared to an acute attack, urine porphyrinogen precursors (i.e., ALA and PBG) may be lower in VP when solely cutaneous lesions are present, but urine porphyrins are still increased to diagnostic levels (27). Porphyrins are always increased in the plasma of patients with active cutaneous lesions (10).
When an individual has symptomatic manifestations of a porphyria (i.e., when clinically active and not latent or in remission), the level of the most excessively excreted heme precursor is typically at least several-fold greater than the values reported for the upper limit of normal. In reports describing the neurologic porphyrias, for example, urine ALA and PBG in AIP increased acutely to 8 to 150 and 30 to 200 mg/day, respectively (normal upper limits, 3 to 7.5 mg/day, depending on the laboratory) (7,20,26,55-57); and in ADP, urine ALA was markedly elevated and urine and erythrocyte porphyrins were elevated up to 100 times (7,10). In reports of the neurocutaneous porphyrias, urine coproporphyrin in HCP increased acutely to 4 to 190 times normal (16,58). In VP, one small case series reported the lowest values of urine ALA, PBG, uroporphyrin, and coproporphyrin in acute attacks to be 9, 12, 190, and 27 times the mean control values, respectively (26), which was consistent with the higher average values reported in a larger series (27). In reports of the cutaneous porphyrias, urine uroporphyrin in PCT increased to about 10 to 375 times normal in over 300 reported cases (except in one case (59), where a single value was within normal range) (60-70), and in EPP, reported erythrocyte protoporphyrin values ranged from 2.4 to 90 times normal (31,65,71), with the exception of a single patient in whom it was elevated by only a factor of 1.4 (31). Finally, in reports of the less common (autosomal-recessive) cutaneous porphyrias, urine porphyrins in CEP were 20 to 60 times normal (7) and in HEP, urine uroporphyrin increased by at least 20-fold and erythrocyte porphyrins increased by 5- to 10-fold (28,29,72). Plasma porphyrin concentrations are markedly increased when there are active skin lesions due to any cutaneous porphyria (10).
The detection of porphyrinuria has potential utility as a biological indicator of exposure to chemicals with porphyrinogenic properties and as a staging measure for subclinical development and progression of chronic hepatic porphyria (see "Chronic Hepatic Porphyria and Environmental Chemicals and Effects on Measures of Heme Synthesis"). However, with the noteworthy exception of lead poisoning (see "Environmental Chemicals and Effects on Measures of Heme Synthesis"), the porphyrin excess in secondary porphyrinuria has no recognized clinically detectable consequences of its own. Most reviewers attribute symptoms associated with secondary porphyrinuria (other than lead poisoning) to the condition or agent causing the porphyrinuria or to an unrelated cause, not to a disturbance in heme synthesis (2,3,10,75,77-81). Still, although the porphyrinuria itself may be benign, an associated medical condition may be far from benign.
Accumulation or excessive excretion of heme precursors does not necessarily mean there is a deficiency of a heme pathway enzyme(s); other possible mechanisms exist. Increased erythropoiesis can produce increases in urine coproporphyrin, as demonstrated by induced anemia in experimental animals (82). Coproporphyrin normally is excreted in bile and in urine, and impaired biliary excretion in hepatobiliary disease leads to increased coproporphyrin excretion in urine (83). Stimulation of hepatic heme synthesis (e.g., by certain drugs) in the absence of deficiency of any heme-synthesis enzymes can lead to increased coproporphyrin excretion. The kidney (primarily the epithelium of the proximal tubules) has been identified as a major source of porphyrins (primarily coproporphyrin) in the urine of normal and porphyric individuals as well as lead- and mercury-poisoned individuals (84-87). It is conceivable that toxic effects on renal tubular function could lead to increased urinary loss of porphyrins along with other substances handled by renal tubules without inhibition of heme synthesis.
The Doss model, however, is not uniformly accepted as valid. The evidence in humans for the Doss model comes from cross-sectional studies of patient populations, not longitudinal studies (77,88). There are no well-documented cases of individual patients actually progressing through CHP Types A, B, and C to PCT, and it has not been demonstrated that mild degrees of porphyrinuria, particularly coproporphyrinuria, predict the potential for an individual to develop PCT. The early stages in the CHP model are characterized primarily by coproporphyrinuria, which can occur nonspecifically with liver disease and may reflect a separate phenomenon. There is no evidence or reason to predict that hepatic Uro-D deficiency is manifested initially by coproporphyrinuria before uroporphyrinuria. In addition, there is evidence that the kidney may be the primary source of coproporphyrin and other porphyrins excreted in normal urine and may also be a major source in certain porphyrias and toxin-induced porphyrinurias (84,91,92).
A number of chemicals, including halogenated hydrocarbons and metals, are known to be porphyrinogenic (i.e., capable of inducing changes in heme synthesis, with subsequent overproduction and excessive excretion of heme precursors) in experimental animals, generally with exposure by ingestion and with doses much greater than the range of human experience (96-98). In addition to possible interspecies differences, the differences in dose and pattern of exposure limit the ability to extrapolate from experimental animal studies in order to assess the potential risks of specific chemicals for humans. Unfortunately, there has been only limited systematic study of the subject in humans. In humans, with the noteworthy exceptions of porphyria caused by hexachlorobenzene (HCB) ingestion and the porphyrinuria caused by lead, reports of porphyria or porphyrinuria attributable to chemical exposures have been infrequent. The reported findings have generally been linked to chronic industrial exposures, industrial accidents, or environmental exposures that were much higher than usually encountered.
Hexachlorobenzene
The most noteworthy incident of chemical-induced porphyria in humans
occurred in Turkey during the late 1950s, when approximately 3000 cases
of PCT developed from the ingestion of seed wheat treated with fungicides
containing about 10% HCB (99-106). The wheat was treated in anticipation
of use for planting but was instead used for human consumption. The syndrome
commonly consisted of weight loss, muscle wasting, weakness, hepatomegaly,
thyromegaly, arthritic changes, gross porphyrinuria, hypertrichosis, and
photosensitive dermopathy (99,102). The dermopathy was usually hyperpigmented
and had vesiculobullous lesions that eventually ulcerated, were commonly
complicated by infections, and left depigmented scars and often disfiguring
contractures. Active skin lesions tended to abate within a month after
HCB exposure ended but often recurred subsequently in summer months, even
in the absence of any new exposure to HCB. Children were affected disproportionately
more than adults. Some reports noted the absence of abdominal crises, mental
disturbances, and other neurologic complications (99,100); others noted
the presence of abdominal colic and muscle weakness during the acute phase
(102). Follow-up studies up to 30 years later reported that a majority
of the patients studied had cutaneous residua, arthritic deformities, thyromegaly
(particularly in women), and neurologic manifestations including weakness,
paresthesias, and sensory shading; smaller proportions of patients had
myotonia or cogwheel rigidity without other extrapyramidal signs (103-106).
Administration of HCB to experimental animals causes a deficiency of hepatic Uro-D and a pattern of porphyrin accumulation closely resembling that in human PCT (89,107-111).
Dioxin
Laboratory experiments have demonstrated that tetrachlorodibenzodioxins
(dioxin(s) or TCDDs) in high ingested doses are porphyrinogenic in rodents
(112,113), but the evidence in humans is mixed. The strongest human evidence
is from two workplace studies. In 1964, a study at a New Jersey chemical
plant that produced the herbicides 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) described two workers with
PCT and another with possible PCT, and also reported that urine uroporphyrins
were positive in 8 of 26 other workers (114). Most workers studied had
chloracne, prototypically caused by dioxin, which was then a frequent contaminant
of 2,4,5-T production. Another study of 55 workers arriving at a hospital
from a Czechoslovakian herbicide manufacturing plant found a high prevalence
of chloracne, 11 workers with PCT, and slightly increased urine uroporphyrin
(¾100 µg/24 hr; reference range not stated) in 21% of those
tested (115). One worker in a TCDD-contaminated workplace developed PCT,
sarcoma, and probable chloracne; the combined occurrence of these rare
conditions suggested an etiological relation to the TCDD exposure (116,117).
Other workplace studies, however, have been less demonstrative. A later
study at the same New Jersey plant found no active cases of PCT and no
workers with abnormal urine excretion of heme precursors except one worker
who formerly had severe PCT (118). Maintenance workers, who had the highest
chemical exposures, were found to have higher average urine coproporphyrin
levels than other workers, but their individual levels were all within
normal limits. Two separate later studies of herbicide production plants
(one of which included the New Jersey plant mentioned above) (119) were
both negative (120).
Limited evidence is also available from community studies. An explosion at a chemical plant in Seveso, Italy, in 1976 contaminated the surrounding environment with TCDDs. Two related individuals who were found to have a preexisting familial defect in Uro-D were reported to manifest PCT after the explosion without another evident precipitating factor (121). Among 60 Seveso residents from other families, 8 were reported to have secondary coproporphyrinuria and 5 had a transition constellation to CHP Type A (121) (see "Chronic Hepatic Porphyria"). Another study, of 115 Seveso residents, found that 84% had urine porphyrin patterns consistent with coproporphyrinuria or CHP Type A, with the greatest prevalence and degree of abnormality in residents from areas of highest contamination (122). A later study, however, reported chloracne but no PCT attributable to TCDDs among Seveso children and adolescents (123,124). In two studies of Missouri communities where TCDD-contaminated waste oil had been sprayed for dust control over several years, there were no cases of PCT, but one study found significantly higher mean uroporphyrin levels in urine and higher prevalence of elevated urine uroporphyrin values (>13 µg/g creatinine (cre) in 16%, vs 7% controls) among 154 residents of a contaminated mobile home park compared to matched control subjects (125,126).
Other Halogenated Hydrocarbons
A number of halogenated hydrocarbons have been demonstrated experimentally
to be porphyrinogenic in exposed animals or in in vitro tests; these are
well summarized in Strik et al. (96) and Marks (97) and will not be described
in this review. The reported human experience is less extensive. Haberman
et al. (127) mentioned that a case of PCT manifested itself soon after
agricultural application of DDT. Lynch et al. (128) reported a case of
PCT in association with hepatitis, which was attributed to chronic toxic
exposure and presumed to be a polychlorinated phenol unintentionially synthesized
on a regular basis by mixing cleaning agents containing benzylchlorophenol
and sodium hypochlorite. A worker with severe acute methyl chloride intoxication
had marked increase in urine and fecal excretion of coproporphyrin but
not uroporphyrin or protoporphyrin; the coproporphyrinuria decreased in
association with clinical improvement (129). Evaluation of 46 workers exposed
to vinyl chloride in a polyvinyl chloride production process found that
36 had coproporphyrinuria (¾820 nmol/24 hr; normal (nl) ¾130),
including 4 who also had mildly increased excretion of uroporphyrin and
heptacarboxyl porphyrin in urine (130). A study of Michigan farm families
exposed to polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) by ingestion of contaminated
meat and dairy products found that 11 of 126 persons had coproporphyrinuria
(93-218 µg/liter; nl¾78), including 4 with mild uroporphyrinuria
(29-59 µg/liter; nl¾24) (131). Of 20 individuals in Taiwan,
2 years after poisoning with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in food oil,
3 had elevated uroporphyrin in urine (50-139 µg/liter; controls,
7-22), 1 of whom, plus 5 others, had elevated coproporphyrin (61-255 µg/liter;
controls, 2-48) (132). Two separate studies of 87 similarly poisoned individuals
in Yusho, Japan, about 10 years after the event, found no differences in
urine porphyrins compared to those of controls and identified PCT in 1
person whose history was complicated by alcohol use (133,134). Total urine
porphyrins were not significantly different from those of controls in 168
chemical plant workers exposed to either allylchloride, hexachlorocyclopentadiene,
epichlorohydrin, or endrin (135).
Lead
Lead absorption, both acute and chronic, is well documented to affect
heme synthesis (11). Lead causes accumulation of zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP)
in erythrocytes and large increases of ALA and coproporphyrin in urine.
Lead reversibly inhibits ALA-D and also appears to interfere with the function
of coproporphyrinogen oxidase and ferrochelatase, possibly by mechanisms
other than direct enzyme inhibition (11,98,136,137). It is conceivable
that the coproporphyrinuria occurs by the same mechanism as in ALA loading
of normal subjects (Biochemistry of Porphyrias).
There is evidence that ALA-D polymorphism may influence lead toxicokinetics. The ALA-D enzyme is comprised of eight identical subunits coded by an autosomal gene, at which there are two common alleles (138). The ALA-D1 allele has about 80 to 90% prevalence in studied European and American population samples; the ALA-D2 allele, about 10 to 20% (138-142). The three associated phenotypes (1-1, 1-2, 2-2) have similar enzyme activities in erythrocytes. A number of studies have reported that individuals with the ALA-D2 allele, particularly the homozygous ALA-D 2-2 phenotype, have higher blood lead levels on average than individuals with the ALA-D 1-1 phenotype and comparable lead exposures (142-145). The possible mechanism of this reported phenomenon is not known, although it has been speculated that ALA-D subunits coded by the ALA-D2 allele might bind lead more efficiently (146). The possible clinical relevance also is unclear. Some investigators have suggested that ALA-D2 might render individuals more susceptible to lead poisoning (143,145); others have suggested that ALA-D2 might protect against lead effects (147).
Lead intoxication is generally classified as a secondary porphyrinuria rather than an acquired porphyria, although some investigators have classified it as a porphyria, noting clinical and biochemical similarities with the acute porphyrias (see Table 1), particularly ADP (39,148-150). It is not known to what degree the manifestations of lead poisoning might be attributable, if at all, to the associated disturbance in heme synthesis apart from the directly neurotoxic properties of lead, but there is evidence the disturbed heme-forming system may have some contributing role (151,152).
The reported interaction between lead exposure and genetic deficiency of ALA-D is noteworthy. ADP is attributable to homozygous autosomal-recessive defects affecting ALA-D, with near total loss of enzyme activity; heterozygous carriers of the defect have only partial loss of ALA-D activity and usually have no associated symptoms (153). However, the heterozygous defect appears to increase the vulnerability of the individual to the effects of exogenous agents such as lead, which reduce ALA-D activity. In case reports of individuals who had a heterozygous defect affecting ALA-D and were exposed to lead, the biochemical abnormalities and clinical features of illness were consistent with lead intoxication but were much more severe than expected for their mildly elevated blood lead levels (22-43 µg/dl) (149,154,155). The prevalence of the heterozygous defect in the general population has been estimated variably to be below 1% (149) or as high as 2% (156).
Other Metals
Mercury, arsenic, and other metal exposures are also reported to affect
heme synthesis in humans, although the associated levels of porphyrinuria
are lower than those seen with lead. In a survey of dentists attending
an annual professional meeting, those who were found to have >20 µg/liter
mercury in spot urine samples also had 2- to 3-fold higher levels of coproporphyrin
in urine (42±18 µg/g cre or 74±8 µg/liter; mean±SD)
than those with no urinary mercury (coproporphyrin 28±12 µg/g
cre and 23±6 µg/liter) (87). Urine uroporphyrin excretions
did not differ significantly; however, pentacarboxyl porphyrin and an atypical
porphyrin tentatively identified as keto-isocoproporphyrin were significantly
elevated in urine. A study of random urine samples from 52 workers exposed
to inorganic and organic mercury (median urine mercury about 500 µg/liter)
found that 23% had elevated coproporphyrin levels (>70 µg/liter and
up to 159 µg/liter) compared to only 3% of control subjects (157).
Similarly, a study of arsenic-exposed smelter workers (urine arsenic 129±109
µg/g cre in the high-exposure group) found more than twice as much
coproporphyrin (63±30, range 18-171, µg/g cre) but comparable
amounts of uroporphyrin in morning urine specimens, relative to those of
nonexposed control subjects (coproporphyrin 27±14, range 2-57, µg/g
cre) (158). In another study, individuals exposed to arsenic in drinking
water (urine arsenic mean 65, range 1-130 µg/liter) were reported
to have no significant increase in urine porphyrin levels relative to those
of a control group, although most exposed individuals did have inversion
of the urine coproporphyrin/uroporphyrin ratio (76%, vs 32% of controls)
(159). Downey (160) reported a case of acute intermittent porphyria (laboratory
results not presented), with symptoms including transient dermatitis, severe
abdominal pain, diarrhea and vomiting, dyscoordination, memory loss, and
visual hallucinations, all of which developed soon after placement of dental
prostheses (containing 76% palladium and 10% copper) and resolved "almost
immediately" after removal of the prostheses.
Experimental animal and in vitro studies have demonstrated a number of other metals to be porphyrinogenic, including aluminum, cadmium (with arsenic or lead), cobalt, gallium arsenide and others; again, these data are summarized in detail in other reviews [Marks (97), Woods (98), Fowler et al. (161)].
Other Chemicals
Bleakley et al. (162) noted, in describing elevated fecal porphyrins
in rats with subchronic cutaneous exposure to diazinon, "in a number of
cases seen [of PCT in humans]...a history of contact with pesticides, in
particular with diazinon." A study of 17 pulp production workers exposed
to hydrogen sulfide and methylmercaptan reported reduced activities of
ALA synthase, ALA-D, and ferrochelatase (relative to reference ranges)
in the reticulocytes of 8, 1, and 5 workers, respectively, as well as low
erythrocyte protoporphyrin levels in 7 workers compared to control values
(163). In two reported case series of acute porphyria, paints and solvents
were described as triggers of acute symptoms in a number of genetically
predisposed individuals (26,164).
Measures of Heme Synthesis as Biological Markers of Chemical Exposure
Measurements of the status of heme synthesis, particularly measurements
of excreted heme precursors, have potential field and clinical utility
as biological indicators of chemical exposure and chemical effect on body
functions (98,165). This is well illustrated by the extensive experience
with lead, where measurements of protoporphyrin in blood [e.g., free erythrocyte
protoporphyrin (FEP) and ZPP] and ALA and coproporphyrin in urine have
been used, and in the case of ZPP are still used, as sensitive markers
of lead intoxication. Animal experiments have demonstrated that a number
of metals produce characteristic patterns of change in the urinary excretion
of heme precursors, that the induced disturbances in heme synthesis are
typically associated with ultrastructural changes and alterations of other
subcellular processes, and that these measurable changes occur before the
effects of metal exposure would be clinically evident (98,161). Therefore,
measurements of heme precursors may offer a means of detecting harmful
effects of specific chemical exposures in humans at stages of biological
response to exposure that are still preclinical and are presumably most
reversible. As the preceding sections indicate, however, only a small number
of studies in humans have attempted to assess the utility and validity
of heme precursor measurements or other measures of the status of heme
synthesis as markers of exposure or preclinical disease in chemically exposed
humans.
The MCS syndrome (178-180) has been defined by Cullen (181) as "an acquired disorder characterized by recurrent symptoms, referable to multiple organ systems, occurring in response to demonstrable exposure to many chemically unrelated compounds at doses far below those established in the general population to cause harmful effects." No physiologic test has been widely accepted as correlating with symptoms in MCS syndrome, although a variety of immunologic and neurologic tests have been described as abnormal or diagnostic based on clinical series data. Of note, however, one blinded prospective controlled study evaluated a panel of immunologic tests offered by a laboratory with recognized interest in the evaluation of individuals with chemical sensitivities, and found that the tests did not distinguish between MCS patients and control patients (182). Still, in spite of continued debates about the origins of MCS syndrome, there is little doubt that it can be associated with substantial symptomatic distress, major lifestyle disruption, and severe degrees of inability to perform usual activities of work and daily life.
To date, the hypotheses of porphyric mechanisms in these otherwise unexplained syndromes are based only on individual cases or case series characterized by relatively mild increases in porphyrin excretion and/or decreases in activity of various heme-synthesis enzymes. The data reported to date have not identified any characteristic unifying pattern(s) among the laboratory test results. Donnay and Ziem (171) reported in 1995 that two medical practices in Washington State had found excess porphyrins and/or enzyme abnormalities in patterns that did not match those of any inherited porphyrias in over 70% of more than 150 MCS patients with symptoms of porphyrinopathy. Morton (172) described laboratory findings for 38 individuals with chemical sensitivities and deficient activity of at least 1 of 5 tested heme-synthesis enzymes. Although he did not distinguish between the marginal and low laboratory reference ranges in defining deficiency (see "Limitations of Laboratory Measures of Heme Synthesis"), 22 (58%) had deficiency of coproporphyrinogen oxidase (Copro-O), 13 (34%) had deficiency of protoporphyrinogen oxidase, and 27 (71%) had at least 1 excess porphyrin in feces or urine (values reported only as yes or no). Of note, 7 of the 22 individuals with Copro-O deficiency and 4 of the 16 individuals with deficiency of enzymes other than Copro-O had no detected excess of porphyrins in feces or urine. Ziem and McTamney presented supporting clinical data at a recent scientific meeting; those data are not yet available for circulation (177).
Downey (168) described hereditary coproporphyria in 13 patients (plus 7 family members) who arrived at an oral stomatology clinic with unexplained oral conditions and multiple systemic complaints: 16 of 19 tested had abnormal Copro-O activity, 3 of those 16 had one other abnormal heme-synthesis enzyme, and 14 of 14 tested had elevated heme precursors in urine or stool. Of the 16 abnormal Copro-O activity values, 14 were in the marginal reference range (0.06-0.09 relative units) and the other 3 values were just below the marginal range (0.05 relative units) (182). Of the 21 elevated heme precursor values (most often coproporphyrin), 17 (81%) were 1.1 to 1.8 times higher than the respective value reported for the upper limit of normal, and 4 (2 in stool and 2 in urine) were 2.0 to 2.3 times higher (182). Downey (167) mentioned that about 90% of 62 patients (including the above-described 19) were found to have one or more heme-synthesis enzyme abnormalities.
Two types of hypotheses have been put forth in explanation of such laboratory findings occurring with otherwise unexplained chemical-associated illnesses. The first hypothesis is that these illnesses are actually porphyrias, in which illness is precipitated by environmental chemical exposures in genetically predisposed individuals (160,167,172). Proponents suggest that the latent genetic traits for various porphyrias are much more common in the general population but were not recognized until the recent increased availability of laboratory assays for the activity of heme-synthesis enzymes. It is hypothesized that such genetically predisposed individuals can manifest porphyria symptoms in low-grade smoldering or chronic and slowly progressive patterns (without classically recognizable acute attacks of severe symptoms) in response to exposures to a variety of substances such as "formaldehyde, other aldehydes, heavy vehicle exhaust fumes, perfumes, other fragrances, chlorine, chlorinated cleaning agents, possibly any chlorinated hydrocarbon, substances in poorly ventilated buildings, and anything that triggers porphyria symptoms" (172). It is contended that these chronic symptom patterns are not necessarily accompanied by diagnostic abnormalities of heme precursors, possibly because a "limited attack especially on a small number of cells or on cells where the heme pathway is not a major functioning system or where the affected cells do not have ready access to external excretory processes may not raise porphyrin precursors above normal levels" (167); measurement of heme-synthesis enzyme activities, therefore, is regarded as critical to diagnosis.
The second hypothesis is that genetic predisposition may not be an essential component of a porphyric mechanism in MCS syndrome, and that reported reductions in activity of heme-synthesis enzymes might represent an acquired deficiency attributable to exogenous toxic agents or stressors, manifesting as either an intoxication porphyria or some other as-yet undefined disorder of porphyrin metabolism (169,171). It is hypothesized that "the heme pathway may be just one of many sites in the body adversely affected by exposure to toxic chemicals, and that this interaction could account for many of the cutaneous, neurological and psychological symptoms reported by MCS patients, including the most controversial symptom of chemical sensitivity itself" [A Donnay, personal communication; (166)]. Some cases of MCS syndrome are predicted to be porphyric and the others nonporphyric (171).
Methodologic Limitations
Laboratory test results, in general, can be compromised by a variety
of factors, including specimen integrity (reflecting conditions of specimen
collection, processing, transport, and storage), analytical quality, limitations
of analytical methods, and the applicability and specificity of reference
ranges, including the range of normal intraindividual variability. Issues
of specimen integrity may be particularly relevant when specimens are collected
and processed at one site and then transported to a geographically distant
reference laboratory, as in nearly all the cases described in "Unexplained
Chemical-associated Illnesses and Measures of Heme Synthesis." Specimen
integrity is a particular concern in enzyme activity assays. There is the
risk of obtaining falsely low measurements of enzyme activity because of
the potential lability of enzymes after removal from the body. Because
of these risks, an abnormal test result generally should be confirmed by
analysis of a second specimen. The need to repeat a test, of course, must
be tempered by the degree of support for a diagnosis from other clinical
and laboratory data, and by the feasibility of repeating the test (i.e.,
the appropriate clinical circumstances should still be present).
Reference Ranges
In addition to considering methodologic limitations, the interpretation
of any laboratory test should consider potential limitations of the test
reference range. First, reference ranges usually do not include all possible
values for normal people (184). It is common laboratory practice to define
a reference range as the mean ± 2 SD, based on the distribution
of test results in an ostensibly normal reference sample; therefore, it
is expected that 5% of normal individuals, and possibly more if the distribution
is skewed, will have low or high outlying values. Second, the range of
possible test values may overlap for normal and affected individuals, and
many tests might be more appropriately characterized as having an inconclusive
range or a continuum between normal and diagnostic ranges, rather than
simply being dichotomized (185-187). Third, the usual ranges of test values
for normal individuals and for individuals with a given disease may differ
so substantially that intermediately abnormal values might be regarded
as nondiagnostic for that disease.
It is particularly important to recognize that there can be considerable normal intraindividual variation in physiologic tests (183); often for specific tests either this has not been characterized or the degree of expected variability has not been made known to the clinician. Any such variation, however, can limit the clinician's ability to interpret a test result confidently as abnormal when an individual's single result is outside the reference range by an amount that is small relative to expected intraindividual variability on that test. One study, for example, reported a 3-fold difference between the highest and lowest total porphyrin measurements in 24-hr urine specimens (normally comprised mostly of coproporphyrin) collected over 7 consecutive days from the same person; all values were normal except one that exceeded the value reported for the upper limit of normal by about 25% (131).
Finally, because a reference range may be unique to the assay method and the laboratory performing the test, test results should be interpreted relative to the laboratory-specific reference range and/or, if sufficient general clinical experience exists, against accepted absolute reference standards. However, a reference range may have limited representativeness for test subjects, even when derived from a large sample of normal individuals, if test subjects differ from the reference sample in terms of the circumstances affecting specimen integrity or in terms of potentially confounding personal factors. For example, the study of PBB-exposed Michigan farm families (see "Environmental Chemicals and Effects on Measures") found total urine porphyrins were significantly higher on average than those in the Dutch reference sample, but they were no different than those in a contemporary control group of Wisconsin farm families (131).
Enzyme Activity Measurements
The diagnostic value of activity measurements for heme-synthesis enzymes
depends on the presence or absence of symptoms and on other clinical and
laboratory data, particularly the level and pattern of any associated overproduction
of heme precursors. Individuals who are genetically predisposed to a porphyria
usually will have deficient activity of the associated enzyme, yet a substantial
proportion will never develop symptoms of a porphyria. Therefore, identification
of the genetic trait alone in a symptomatic patient is not by itself sufficient
evidence of symptom causality. In addition, reductions in enzyme activity
do not necessarily reflect a genetic trait; certain exogenous agents such
as alcohol or lead can inhibit or interfere with the activity or alter
the synthesis of specific enzymes in the heme synthesis pathway (11,74).
Conversely, normal enzyme activity measurements can reduce the likelihood,
although they do not completely eliminate the possibility, that a person
has porphyria. There is typically a substantial degree of overlap in enzyme
activity values for normal individuals and for individuals with a porphyria
characterized by deficiency in that enzyme (73,188). Also, some porphyrias
do not necessarily manifest the associated enzyme deficiency in erythroid
cells, even though it may be present in other tissues (e.g., variant AIP,
when a mutation is in or near exon 1 of the PBG deaminase gene and affects
only the nonerythroid enzyme) (10).
The measurement of specific heme-synthesis enzyme activities is commonly considered a second-line test in the evaluation of porphyrias (189). Enzyme activity measurements are most often used for identifying a genetic trait for porphyria in family members of a person with diagnosed or suspected porphyria to identify individuals who should be counseled on the need to minimize or avoid exposure to factors known to precipitate porphyria, even though they may have been asymptomatic to date (7,188,190,191). Enzyme activity measurements also can be useful when a symptomatic person is diagnosed as having a porphyria of some type--based on symptom pattern and a substantial increase in excretion of heme precursor(s)--but the pattern of heme-precursor excretion does not allow differentiation of the specific type of porphyria; proof of deficient activity for a specific heme-synthesis enzyme can facilitate determination of the specific porphyria. Measurements of enzyme activity otherwise have limited utility in the evaluation of suspected porphyria in symptomatic individuals.
Coproporphyrinogen Oxidase Activity
Decreased Copro-O activity is the most frequently identified enzyme
finding, and in many cases is the sole basis for diagnosing a disturbance
of heme synthesis in the above-mentioned cases of unexplained chemical-associated
illnesses with reportedly abnormal measures of heme synthesis (see "Unexplained
Chemical-associated Illnesses and Measures of Heme Synthesis").
The assay for Copro-O activity is the subject of some controversy. At present, only one laboratory offers a Copro-O activity assay on a commercial basis. That assay is performed by the incubation of ALA substrate with a lysed peripheral blood cell specimen, followed by analysis of the porphyrins formed; a low yield of protoporphyrin and a normal or increased yield of coproporphyrins indicate a deficiency of Copro-O (183). The commercial assay, therefore, uses coproporphyrinogen synthesized enzymatically in situ from ALA added to the incubate. In contrast, research laboratories that perform Copro-O activity assays in peripheral blood cells do so in isolated leukocyte or lymphocyte fractions, using externally synthesized coproporphyrinogen as specific substrate (16,192-194).
It is widely believed that heme synthesis in humans is confined to nucleated cells and that Copro-O is a mitochondrial enzyme. However, there is little published information that addresses the relative degrees of Copro-O activity in reticulocytes, mature erythrocytes, and leukocytes (16,195,196). Heme synthesis in peripheral blood cells is expected to occur only in leukocytes and perhaps in reticulocytes, and not in mature erythrocytes, which lack nuclei and mitochondria and which constitute about 99% of peripheral blood cells. Mitochondria are present in nucleated blood cells but are not normally present in mature erythrocytes. Developers of the lysed-blood assay maintain, however, that circulating erythrocytes can transform 10 to 40% of available coproporphyrinogen III to protoporphyrinogen during 3-hr incubations, with reticulocytes having at least twice as much Copro-O activity as older erythrocytes, and with overall erythrocyte activity far exceeding that seen in lymphocytes (RD Ellefson, personal communication). The subcellular distribution of the reported Copro-O activity in erythrocytes is unclear; remnants of mitochondria are one speculated possibility.
It is generally agreed that because the percentage of reticulocytes varies among normal persons and can change dramatically in a number of disease states, interpretation of test values from the lysed-blood assay should at least be adjusted for the reticulocyte count (183). It is also agreed that regardless of the technique used to assay activity, Copro-O is a particularly labile enzyme after removal from the body. Vigorous specimen processing or failure to properly maintain the specimen during transport or storage can cause enzyme damage and produce falsely low (i.e., false positive) test results (183).
Laboratory Evaluation--Diagnosis of Porphyria
The nature and pattern of a patient's symptoms and physical signs may
provide some guidance in the selection of tests for evaluating the symptomatic
patient with suspected porphyria. However, the neurologic and cutaneous
manifestations of porphyrias can be nonspecific or atypical and caution
is necessary to avoid being overly focused on the basis of clinical appearance
in initial test selection. Reviewers make slightly different recommendations
regarding the appropriate panel of first-line tests for the evaluation
of suspected porphyria. The most common recommendation--when symptoms suggest
possible neurologic manifestation(s) of an acute porphyria--is for the
measurement of PBG with or without ALA in urine (46,52,54,189). Most reviewers
also recommend quantification of total or individual porphyrins in urine
and, routinely or supplementally, in stool--particularly when symptoms
or signs suggest possible cutaneous manifestations of porphyria. Measurement
of protoporphyrin in blood is often recommended, depending on the degree
of suspicion for erythropoietic protoporphyria. Anderson (10) alternatively
recommends measurement of total plasma porphyrins, plus urine PBG and ALA,
to determine the presence or absence of porphyria. A blood lead level,
with or without a ZPP level, should also be considered because of the similarity
of symptoms in lead poisoning and porphyrias with neurologic manifestations.
It is generally less difficult to determine whether a patient has porphyria than it is to differentiate which specific type of porphyria is present. The presence or absence of increases in urinary ALA and PBG and the relative increases in the individual porphyrins are particularly helpful in diagnosis. The nature and pattern of reported symptoms can assist in differentiation. The cited general references and review articles (1-10,46,52,54,189) provide information regarding the patterns of laboratory abnormalities to consider in attempting to differentiate the specific type of porphyria in the patient who has laboratory and clinical evidence consistent with a porphyria. We will not discuss further this level of differential diagnosis; we will focus on preliminary screening steps in the diagnostic evaluation of a possible porphyria.
Laboratory Evaluation--Excluding Porphyria as the Cause of Symptoms
As discussed in "Biochemistry of Porphyrias," when a porphyria (or
another clinically important disturbance of heme synthesis, e.g., lead
intoxication) of any recognized type is symptomatic, it is almost always
accompanied by substantial overproduction and increased excretion of heme
precursors, typically at least several-fold greater than the value reported
for the upper limit of normal. One possible but infrequent exception occurs
after a patient with acute porphyria develops a neurologic deficit that
becomes permanent while the porphyria is otherwise in remission; biochemical
parameters may return to normal ranges.
Conversely, in a patient who is currently or recently symptomatic and who is suspected to have a porphyria, it is not probable that the patient's symptoms are attributable to a porphyria of any type unless a measurement on at least one of the following tests is greater than twice the value reported for the upper limit of normal: ALA, PBG, uroporphyrin, or coproporphyrin in urine; blood total porphyrins; or fecal coproporphyrin (see "Biochemistry of Porphyrias") (90,189). A blood lead level should be checked to determine the possibility of lead intoxication if lead exposure is possible, if excretion of coproporphyrin or ALA is increased, or if blood porphyrins (e.g., ZPP) are increased. If a person is currently or recently symptomatic and has reduced activity of a specific heme-synthesis enzyme, but laboratory testing does not reveal overproduction of heme precursors in a pattern and levels consistent with the porphyria associated with deficiency of that enzyme, then the reduction in measured enzyme activity has no probable causative relationship to the person's symptoms.
Satisfaction of these 2-fold-threshold screening criteria does not necessarily establish a diagnosis of porphyria. Depending on the degree and pattern of abnormalities on these tests, additional testing may be necessary to establish or exclude a diagnosis of porphyria. It is possible that an individual could have an abnormal heme-precursor measurement with this degree of abnormality as a consequence of something other than porphyria (or lead intoxication). Other medical conditions can cause secondary porphyrinuria of this magnitude. Blood porphyrins can also be increased by this magnitude in conditions other than porphyria; for example, iron deficiency commonly produces an increase in blood ZPP.
Conversely, failure to satisfy these 2-fold threshold-screening criteria does not necessarily exclude a diagnosis of porphyria. Heme-precursor measurements in the range of one to two times the value reported for the upper limit of normal should not be interpreted as normal but rather as indeterminate or nondiagnostic. The timing of sample collection relative to the occurrence of symptoms is critical. When a patient with suspected porphyria is not currently or recently symptomatic, the levels of heme-precursor excretion are generally lower and can even normalize with time (i.e., within days to weeks). If a patient's last symptoms occurred remotely in the time relative to specimen collection, it may be necessary to repeat the tests during or as soon as possible after future symptoms. In view of expected interindividual variations and the potential processing and analytic limitations of laboratory tests, particularly at the low range of abnormality, mildly abnormal levels of heme-precursor excretion generally should be repeated before utilizing them as justification for further diagnostic assessment.
Secondary Porphyrinurias
Indeterminate or nondiagnostic levels of porphyrin excretion might
represent a secondary porphyrinuria. With the noteworthy exception of lead
poisoning, the porphyrin excess in secondary porphyrinuria has no recognized
clinically detectable consequences of its own. Medical conditions that
appear to have only secondary effects on the heme synthesis pathway are
appropriately evaluated, with attention focused on the primary condition.
Similarly, when chemical exposures are suspected as the cause of a patient's
symptoms or medical condition, the exposure relationship can be characterized
more specifically by exposure assessment or by quantification of the suspected
chemical (or its metabolite) in blood or urine than by measurement of heme
precursors. Lead poisoning, for example, is probably the most commonly
recognized condition that can result from a chemical exposure and that
is accompanied by abnormal measures of heme synthesis. However, even though
these measures provide sensitive indicators of lead exposure and effect,
the blood lead level is a more sensitive and more specific test for the
diagnosis and management of lead poisoning.
It is also clear that certain exogenous chemical exposures can actually cause porphyria in the absence of genetic predisposition. This is demonstrated most convincingly by the Turkish epidemic of PCT caused by HCB intoxication. Other chemicals have also been linked to cases of porphyria in humans; the reported cases, however, have been infrequent, have all involved PCT, and have generally been linked to chronic industrial exposures, industrial accidents, or environmental exposures that were much higher than normally encountered. Chemical exposures have not been established as a cause (i.e., not just a trigger in the presence of genetic predisposition) of porphyrias with primarily neurologic manifestations, although lead intoxication is noteworthy as a possible exception.
There is no doubt that lead absorption can cause substantial disturbance of heme synthesis. Lead intoxication has prominent manifestations as well as biochemical abnormalities that mimic the manifestations of the neurologic porphyrias. It is not known to what degree the neurologic manifestations of lead poisoning might be attributable (if at all) to the associated disturbance in heme synthesis, apart from the directly neurotoxic properties of lead, but there is evidence the disturbed heme-forming system may have some contributing role.
It must be acknowledged that there have been only a limited number of systematic attempts to identify porphyria or even subclinical porphyrinuria in chemically exposed humans, and that a large number of chemicals have been identified as porphyrinogenic in experimental animals--albeit with doses much greater than the usual range of human experience. In some cases, these effects result from inhibition of or interference with specific enzymes in the heme synthesis pathway; however, some of these effects can be produced by mechanisms that do not involve an abnormality in the heme-forming system. Regardless of the causative mechanism, these chemical-related changes have potential utility as biological indicators of chemical exposures that might have significant pathologic effects. There is a need for further research, including trial field applications, of such porphyrin biomarkers.
Clinicians should maintain a reasonable degree of suspicion for the possibility of a disturbance in heme synthesis underlying any unexplained syndrome characterized by nonspecific symptoms if even mildly reminiscent of porphyria, whether or not environmental chemical exposures are suspected as causative or contributing agents. However, heme-precursor measurements obtained when a patient is symptomatic should be interpreted cautiously and/or repeated if not substantially elevated (i.e., at least 2-fold greater) relative to the respective value reported for the upper limit of normal.
With the noteworthy exceptions of lead intoxication and the porphyrias in clinically active states, the porphyrin excess associated with porphyrinurias has no known clinically detectable consequences of its own. Symptoms associated with such secondary porphyrinurias are attributed by most reviewers to the condition or agent causing the porphyrinuria or to an unrelated cause and not to a disturbance in heme synthesis. Such porphyrinuria may be relevant as a nonspecific laboratory indicator of some other operative pathophysiologic mechanism, much as an elevated sedimentation rate can provide contributory but nonspecific evidence of disease; however, it is most appropriate for further diagnostic attention to focus on the primary condition or exposure of concern, not necessarily on a mild disturbance of heme synthesis.
A variety of chemical-associated illnesses with unknown causative mechanisms, notably MCS syndrome, have been reported in association with abnormal results of porphyria-related tests. It is hypothesized that these test values reflect pathophysiologic disturbances of heme synthesis that are directly involved in the manifestation of those illnesses. Proponents of these hypotheses point out that many MCS symptoms resemble the neurologic and cutaneous manifestations of porphyrias. Yet, cutaneous symptoms are usually not a major feature of MCS syndrome, and when present, they differ substantially from the cutaneous manifestations of the inherited and acquired porphyrias. The noncutaneous symptoms of MCS syndrome are much less intense and less discretely episodic than the common neurologic manifestations of porphyrias. The clinical course of porphyrias with neurologic manifestations can, as with MCS syndrome, occur in a chronic or indolent pattern, and does not occur exclusively as acute symptom attacks separated by symptom-free intervals; however, in the neurologic porphyrias, in contrast to MCS syndrome, the chronic pattern occurs much less frequently than the pattern of acute symptom attacks.
Proponents of porphyric hypotheses for MCS syndrome point out another similarity with the porphyrias--the propensity for symptoms to be caused or triggered by exogenous chemical exposures. However, the very low levels of exposure to which MCS patients are characteristically sensitive are much lower than the pharmacological doses of drugs that are known to trigger neurologic symptoms in genetically predisposed individuals. These levels are also much lower than the chemical exposures reported to date in association with PCT or subclinical porphyrinurias in humans, where situations generally have involved chronic industrial exposures, industrial accidents, or environmental exposures that were much higher than normally encountered, and with the exception of lead intoxication, have not been reported to involve low-level environmental exposures.
It is conceptually difficult to reconcile why MCS syndrome, if mediated substantially through a disturbance in heme synthesis, would have a markedly greater degree of chemical intolerance and greater frequency of chronic functional limitations than recognized forms of prophyria but would never manifest symptoms or signs as severe as can occur with porphyrias, and would have markedly lower or even absent elevations of heme-precursor excretion when symptomatic compared to porphyria patients when symptomatic. One contention is that circumscribed disturbances of heme synthesis (i.e., limited to a small number of cells) can cause symptoms without producing measurable or substantial increases in heme precursors and that heme-synthesis enzyme measurements, therefore, are the more critical, if not the only necessary, diagnostic measure. Although it is well recognized that heme synthesis can be disproportionately affected in different organ systems with any one type of porphyria, it is contrary to other clinical evidence to date (with rare exceptions) that a disturbance of heme synthesis is so profound as to produce symptoms without also producing substantial elevations of heme precursors. Similarly, there is no other evidence to date that a heme-synthesis enzyme with low activity, particularly when marginal activity values are overinterpreted as low, can be linked to symptoms without an accompanying substantial increase in heme precursors.
It is sometimes contended in individual cases that the timing of specimen collection was not sufficiently close in time to a symptom episode to depict the full degree of heme-precursor abnormalities associated with that individual's symptoms. Although the biochemical abnormalities of some porphyrias may return to normal ranges during periods of clinical remission, such normalization generally requires at least several days or weeks, if it occurs at all. Given the typical frequency of symptom episodes in individuals with MCS syndrome, and if a disturbance of heme synthesis is an operative pathophysiologic mechanism, the timing of specimen collection should not be an issue.
To date, the efforts to relate MCS syndrome and other unexplained chemical-associated
illnesses to disturbances of heme synthesis have all involved selected
case series with no consistent or stated case definitions, using only laboratory
reference ranges for comparisons, and with little or no attention to the
methodologic and interpretive limitations of measures of heme synthesis.
Based on the limited existing data, it is reasonable at least to consider
the possibility that there might be a higher than previously recognized
prevalence of abnormalities in measures of heme synthesis among patients
with MCS syndrome. However, to date there is no convincing evidence that
there is--or is not--any such increased prevalence of abnormal measures
of heme synthesis associated with MCS syndrome. Given the current paucity
of evidence in favor of disturbances of heme synthesis being operative
in MCS syndrome and other unexplained chemical-associated illnesses, and
unless supportive evidence can be provided by well designed and controlled
studies, the proposed relationships with disturbances of heme synthesis
should, at most, be considered speculative and unestablished. In cases
involving these otherwise unexplained illnesses, and when there is no demonstrable
substantial accumulation or increased excretion of heme precursors, it
is premature or unfounded either to apply a diagnosis of porphyria (or
any less defined pathologic disturbance of heme synthesis) or to use such
diagnoses as specific justification for lifestyle alterations or therapeutic
interventions; porphyria-specific interventions, such as intravenous hematin,
should not be recommended in such instances.
References
1. Moore MR, McColl KEL, Rimington C, Goldberg A. Disorders of Porphyrin Metabolism. New York:Plenum Medical Book Co, 1987.
2. Bonkovsky HL. Porphyrin and heme metabolism and the porphyrias. In: Hepatology: A Textbook of Liver Disease. 2nd ed (Zakim D, Boyer TD, eds). Philadelphia:WB Saunders, 1990;378-424.
3. Bloomer JR, Straka JG, Rank JM. The porphyrias. In: Diseases of the Liver. 7th ed (Schiff L, Schiff ER, eds). Philadelphia:JB Lippincott Co, 1993;1438-1464.
4. Lee GR. Porphyria. In: Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology, 9th ed (Lee GR, Bithell TC, Foerster J, Athens JW, Lukens JN, eds). Philadelphia:Lea & Febiger, 1993;1272-1297.
5. Moore MR. Biochemistry of porphyria. Int J Biochem 25:1353-1368 (1993).
6. Desnick RJ, Anderson KE. Heme biosynthesis and its disorders: porphyrias and sideroblastic anemias. In: Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. 2nd ed (Hoffman R, Benz EJ Jr, Shattil SJ, Furie B, Cohen HJ, Silberstein LE, eds). New York:Churchill Livingstone, 1995;523-545.
7. Kappas A, Sassa S, Galbraith RA, Nordmann Y. The porphyrias. In: The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 7th ed (Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds). New York:McGraw-Hill, 1995;2103-2159.
8. Perlroth MG. The porphyrias. In: Scientific American Medicine (Rubenstein E, Federman DD, eds). New York:Scientific American, 1994;Section 9(V):1-15.
9. Sassa S. The porphyrias. In: Williams Hematology. 5th ed (Beutler E, Lichtman MA, Coller BS, Kipps TJ, eds). New York:McGraw-Hill, 1995;726-746.
10. Anderson KE. The porphyrias. In: Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 20th ed (Bennett JC, Plum F, eds). Philadelphia:WB Saunders, 1996;1124-1131.
11. Rossi E, Taketani S, Garcia-Webb P. Lead and the terminal mitochondrial enzymes of haem biosynthesis. Biomed Chromatogr 7:1-6 (1993).
12. Ostrowski J, Kostrzewska E, Michalak T, Zawirska B, Medrzejewski W, Gregor A. Abnormalities in liver function and morphology and impaired aminopyrine metabolism in hereditary hepatic porphyrias. Gastroenterology 85:1131-1137 (1983).
13. Hardell L, Bengtssom NO, Jonsson U, Eriksson S, Larsson LG. Aetiological aspects on primary liver cancer with special regard to alcohol, organic solvents and acute intermittent porphyria--an epidemiological investigation. Br J Cancer 50:389-397 (1984).
14. Lithner F, Wetterberg L. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with acute intermittent porphyria. Acta Med Scand 215:271-274 (1984).
15. Kauppinen R, Mustajoki P. Acute hepatic porphyria and hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 57:117-120 (1988).
16. Brodie MJ, Thompson GG, Moore MR, Beattie AD, Goldberg A. Hereditary coproporphyria: demonstration of the abnormalities in haem biosynthesis in peripheral blood. Q J Med 46:229-241 (1977).
17. Andrews J, Erdjument H, Nicholson DC. Hereditary coproporphyria: incidence in a large English family. J Med Genet 21:341-349 (1984).
18. Kauppinen R, Mustajoki P. Prognosis of acute porphyria: occurrence of acute attacks, precipitating factors, and associated diseases. Medicine 71:1-13 (1992).
19. Ridley A. The neuropathy of acute intermittent porphyria. Q J Med 38(151):307-333 (1969).
20. Stein JA, Tschudy DP. Acute intermittent porphyria: a clinical and biochemical study of 46 patients. Medicine 49:1-16 (1970).
21. Leonhardt KF, von Tiepermann R, Doss M. Family studies of patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP): neurological, biochemical, and genetic investigations. In: Diagnosis and Therapy of Porphyrias and Lead Intoxication (Doss M, ed). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1978;94-99.
22. Kaelbling R, Craig JB, Pasamanick B. Urinary porphobilinogen: results of screening 2,500 psychiatric patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 5:494-508 (1961).
23. McEwin R, Lawn J, Jonas CT. A survey of porphyria among psychiatric patients. Med J Aust 2:303-306 (1972).
24. Tishler PV, Woodward B, O'Connor J, Holbrook DA, Seidman LJ, Hallett M, Knighton DJ. High prevalence of intermittent acute porphyria in a psychiatric patient population. Am J Psychiatry 142:1430-1436 (1985).
25. Patience DA, Blackwood DH, McColl KE, Moore MR. Acute intermittent porphyria and mental illness--a family study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 89:262-267 (1994).
26. Mustajoki P, Koskelo P. Hereditary hepatic porphyrias in Finland. Acta Med Scand 200:171-178 (1976).
27. Eales L, Day RS, Blekkenhorst GH. The clinical and biochemical features of variegate porphyria: an analysis of 300 cases studied at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. Int J Biochem 12:837-853 (1980).
28. Toback AC, Sassa S, Poh-Fitzpatrick MB, Schechter J, Zaider E, Harber LC, Kappas A. Hepatoerythropoietic porphyria: clinical, biochemical, and enzymatic studies in a three-generation family linkage. N Engl J Med 316:645-650 (1987).
29. Fujimoto A, Brazil JL. Hepatoerythropoietic porphyria in a woman with short stature and deformed hands. Am J Hum Genet 44:496-499 (1992).
30. Bickers DR. The dermatologic manifestations of human porphyria. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:261-267 (1987).
31. DeLeo VA, Poh-Fitzpatrick M, Mathews-Roth M, Harber LC. Erythropoietic protoporphyria: 10 years experience. Am J Med 60:8-22 (1976).
32. Elder GH, Uruquhart AJ, de Salamanca RE, Munoz JJ, Bonkovsky HL. Immunoreactive uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase in porphyria cutanea tarda. Lancet 2(8449):229-233 (1985).
33. Sweeney GD. Porphyria cutanea tarda, or the uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase deficiency diseases. Clin Biochem 19(2):3-15 (1986).
34. Fargion S, Piperno A, Cappellini MD, Sampietro M, Fracanzani AL, Romano R, Caldarelli R, Marcelli R, Vecchi L, Fiorelli G. Hepatitis C virus and porphyria cutanea tarda: evidence of a strong association. Hepatology 16:1322-1326 (1992).
35. DeCastro M, Sanchez J, Herrera JF, Chaves A, Duran R, Garcia-Buey L, Garcia-Monzon C, Sequi J, Moreno-Otero R. Hepatitis C virus antibodies and liver disease in patients with porphyria cutanea tarda. Hepatology 17:551-557 (1993).
36. Herrero C, Vicente A, Bruguera M, Ercilla MG, Barrera JM, Vidal J, Teres J, Mascaro JM, Rodes J. Is hepatitis C virus infection a trigger of porphyria cutanea tarda? Lancet 341:788-789 (1993).
37. Navas S, Bosch O, Castillo I, Marriott E, Carreno V. Porphyria cutanea tarda and hepatitis C and B viruses infection: a retrospective study. Hepatology 21:279-284 (1995).
38. Stolzel U, Kostler E, Koszka C, Stoffler-Meilicke M, Schuppan D, Somasundaram R, Doss MO, Habermehl KO, Riecken EO. Low prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in porphyria cutanea tarda in Germany. Hepatology 21:1500-1503 (1995).
39. Doss MO. Hepatic porphyrias: pathobiochemical, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications. In: Progress in Liver Diseases (Popper H, Schaffner F, eds). New York:Grune & Stratton, 1982;573-597.
40. Kordac V. Frequency of occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with porphyria cutanea tarda in long-term followup. Neoplasma 19:135-139 (1972).
41. Cortes JM, Oliva J, Paradinas FJ, Hernandez-Guio C. The pathology of the liver in porphyria cutanea tarda. Histopathology 4:471-485 (1980).
42. Packe GE, Clarke CFW. Is porphyria cutanea tarda a risk factor in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma? A case report and review of the literature. Oncology 42:44-47 (1985).
43. Tio TH, Leijnse B, Jarrett A, Rimington C. Acquired porphyria from a liver tumor. Clin Sci 16:517-524 (1957).
44. Thompson RPH, Nicholson DC, Farnan MB, Whitmore DN, Williams R. Cutaneous porphyria due to a malignant primary hepatoma. Gastroenterology 59:779-783 (1970).
45. Waddington RT. A case of primary liver tumour associated with porphyria. Br J Surg 59:653-654 (1972).
46. Moore MR, Disler PB. Biochemical diagnosis of the porphyrias. Clin Dermatol 3(2):24-40 (1985).
47. Beukeveld GJJ, Wolthers BG, van Saene JJM, de Haan THIJ, de Ruyter-Buitenhuis LW, van Saene RHF. Patterns of porphyrin excretion in feces as determined by liquid chromatography: reference values and the effect of flora suppression. Clin Chem 33:2164-2170 (1987).
48. Logan GM, Weimer MK, Ellefson M, Pierach CA, Bloomer JR. Bile porphyrin analysis in the evaluation of variegate porphyria. N Engl J Med 324:1408-1411 (1991).
49. Meyer UA, Strand LJ, Doss M, Rees AC, Marver HS. Intermittent acute porphyria--demonstration of a genetic defect in porphobilinogen metabolism. N Engl J Med 286:1277-1282 (1972).
50. Shimizu Y, Ida S, Naruto H, Urata G. Excretion of porphyrins in urine and bile after the administration of delta-aminolevulinic acid. J Lab Clin Med 92:795-802 (1978).
51. Anderson KE, Drummond GS, Freddara U, Sardana MK,
Sassa S. Porphyrogenic effects and induction of heme oxygenase in vivo
by -aminolevulinic acid. Biochim Biophys
Acta 676:289-299 (1981).
52. Elder GH, Smith SG, Smyth SJ. Laboratory investigation of the porphyrias. Ann Clin Biochem 27:395-412 (1990).
53. Kushner JP. Editorial: Laboratory diagnosis of the porphyrias. N Engl J Med 324:1432-1434 (1991).
54. Tefferi A, Solberg LA, Jr., Ellefson RD. Porphyrias: clinical evaluation and interpretation of laboratory tests. Mayo Clin Proc 69:289-290 (1994).
55. Waldenstrom J. The porphyrias as inborn errors of metabolism. Am J Med 22:758-773 (1957).
56. Ackner B, Cooper JE, Gray CH, Kelly M, Nicholson DC.
Excretion of porphobilinogen and -aminolaevulinic
acid in acute porphyria. Lancet 1:1256-1260 (1961).
57. Mahood WH, Killough JH. Acute intermittent porphyria: a clinical and laboratory study of a large family. Ann Intern Med 64:259-267 (1966).
58. Dean G, Kramer S, Lamb P. Coproporphyria. S Afr Med J 43:138-142 (1969).
59. Taylor JS. Porphyria cutanea tarda symptomatica. Cutis 6:1261-1274 (1970).
60. Epstein JH, Pinski JB. Porphyria cutanea tarda: association with abnormal iron metabolism. Arch Dermatol 92:362-366 (1965).
61. Dowdle E, Goldswain P, Spong N, Eales L. The pattern of porphyrin isomer accumulation and excretion in symptomatic porphyria. Clin Sci 39:147-158 (1970).
62. Lundvall O, Weinfeld A, Lundin P. Iron storage in porphyria cutanea tarda. Acta Med Scand 188:37-53 (1970).
63. Reizenstein P, Hoglund S, Landegren J, Carlmark B, Forsberg K. Iron metabolism in porphyria cutanea tarda. Acta Med Scand 198:95-99 (1975).
64. Kushner JP, Barbuto AJ, Lee GR. An inherited enzymatic defect in porphyria cutanea tarda: decreased uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase activity. J Clin Invest 58:1089-1097 (1976).
65. Felsher BF, Norris ME, Shih JC. Red-cell uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase activity in porphyria cutanea tarda and in other forms of porphyria. N Engl J Med 299:1095-1098 (1978).
66. Topi G, D'Alessandro Gandolfo L. Inheritance of porphyria cutanea tarda: analysis of 14 cases in 5 families. Br J Dermatol 97:617-627 (1977).
67. Grossman ME, Bickers DR, Poh-Fitzpatrick MB, Deleo VA, Harber LC. Porphyria cutanea tarda: clinical features and laboratory findings in 40 patients. Am J Med 67:277-286 (1979).
68. Kordac V, Jirsa M, Kalab M. Chloroquine in the treatment of porphyria cutanea tarda. In: Diagnosis and Therapy of Porphyrias and Lead Intoxication (Doss M, ed). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1978;127-132.
69. von Tiepermann R, Doss M. Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase (Uro-D) defect in erythrocytes in chronic hepatic porphyrias. In: Diagnosis and Therapy of Porphyrias and Lead Intoxication (Doss M, ed). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1978;111-116.
70. Elder GH, Sheppard DM, de Salamanca RE, Olmos A. Identification of two types of porphyria cutanea tarda by measurement of erythrocyte uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase. Clin Sci 58:477-484 (1980).
71. Reed WB, Wuepper KD, Epstein JH, Redeker A, Simonson RJ, McKusick VA. Erythropoietic protoporphyria: a clinical and genetic study. JAMA 214:1060-1066 (1970).
72. de Verneuil H, Beaumont C, Deybach J-C, Nordmann Y, Sfar Z, Kastally R. Enzymatic and immunological studies of uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase in familial porphyria cutanea tarda and hepatoerythropoietic porphyria. Am J Hum Genet 36:613-622 (1984).
73. McColl KEL, Goldberg A. Abnormal porphyrin metabolism in diseases other than porphyria. Clin Haematol 9:427-444 (1980).
74. Doss MO. Alcohol and porphyrin metabolism. In: Alcohol Related Diseases in Gastroenterology (Seitz HK, Kommerell B, eds). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1985;232-252.
75. Doss MO. Porphyrinurias and occupational disease. Ann NY Sci 514:204-218 (1987).
76. Sieg I, Doss MO, Kandels H, Schneider J. Effect of
alcohol on -aminolevulinic acid dehydratase
and porphyrin metabolism in man. Clin Chim Acta 202:211-218 (1991).
77. Doss M. Pathobiochemical transition of secondary coproporphyrinuria to chronic hepatic porphyria in humans. Klin Wochenschr 58:141-148 (1980).
78. Bissell DM. Porphyria. In: Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 18th ed (Wyngaarden JB, Smith LH Jr, eds). Philadelphia:WB Saunders, 1988;1182-1187.
79. Bloomer JR, Bonkovsky HL. The porphyrias. Dis Mon 35:1-54 (1989).
80. Rank JM, Straka JG, Bloomer JR. Porphyria. In: Liver and Biliary Diseases (Kaplowitz N, ed). Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins, 1992;479-492.
81. Wyckoff EE, Kushner JP. Heme biosynthesis, the porphyrias, and the liver. In: The Liver: Biology and Pathobiology. 3rd ed (Arias IM, Boyer JL, Fausto N, Jakoby WB, Schachter DA, Shafritz DA, eds). New York:Raven, 1994;505-527.
82. Watson CJ. Porphyrin metabolism in the anemias. Arch Intern Med 99:323-333 (1957).
83. Kaplowitz N, Javitt N, Kappas A. Coproporphyrin I and III excretion in bile and urine. J Clin Invest 51:2895-2899 (1972).
84. Day RS, Eales L, Disler PB. Editorial: Porphyrias and the kidney. Nephron 28:261-267 (1981).
85. Henderson MJ, Toothill C. Urinary coproporphyrin in lead intoxication: a study in the rabbit. Clin Sci 65:527-532 (1983).
86. Woods JS. Regulation of porphyrin and heme metabolism in the kidney. Semin Hematol 25:336-348 (1988).
87. Woods JS, Martin MD, Naleway CA, Echeverria D. Urinary porphyrin profiles as a biomarker of mercury exposure: studies on dentists with occupational exposure to mercury vapor. J Toxicol Environ Health 40:235-246 (1993).
88. Doss M. Chronic hepatic porphyrias in humans (endogenic factors). In: Chemical Porphyria in Man (Strik JJTWA, Koeman JH, eds). Amsterdam:Elsevier/North-Holland, 1979;11-25.
89. Doss M, Schermuly E, Koss G. Hexachlorobenzene porphyria in rats as a model for human chronic hepatic porphyrias. Ann Clin Res 8 (Suppl 17):171-181 (1976).
90. Doss MO, Sassa S. The porphyrias. In: Laboratory Medicine: The Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Laboratory Studies (Noe DA, Rock RC, eds). Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins, 1994;535-553.
91. Day RS, Blekkenhorst GH, Eales L. Drug induced acute porphyric episodes in rats. Int J Biochem 12:1007-1011 (1980).
92. Woods JS, Southern MR. Studies on the etiology of trace metal-induced porphyria: effects of porphyrinogenic metals on coproporphyrinogen oxidase in rat liver and kidney. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 97:183-190 (1989).
93. Moore MR, McColl KEL. Therapy of the acute porphyrias. Clin Biochem 22:181-188 (1989).
94. Moore MR. Acute porphyrias. British National Formulary 31:401-402 (1996).
95. McColl KEL, Dover SB, Fitzsimons EJ, Moore MR. Porphyrin metabolism and the porphyrias. In: Oxford Textbook of Medicine. 3rd ed (Weatherall DJ, Ledingham JGG, Warrell DA, eds). Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1996;1388-1399.
96. Strik JJTWA, Debets FMH, Koss G. Chemical porphyria. In: Halogenated Biphenyls, Terphenyls, Naphthalenes, Dibenzodioxins and Related Products (Kimbrough RD, ed). Amsterdam:Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1980;191-239.
97. Marks GS. Exposure to toxic agents: the heme biosynthetic pathway and hemoproteins as indicator. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 15(2):151-179 (1985).
98. Woods JS. Porphyrin metabolism as indicator of metal exposure and toxicity. In: Toxicology of Metals; Biochemical Aspects. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol 115 (Goyer RA, Cherian MG, eds). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1995;19-52.
99. Schmid R. Cutaneous porphyria in Turkey. N Engl J Med 263:397-398 (1960).
100. Cam C, Nigogosyan G. Acquired toxic porphyria cutanea tarda due to hexachlorobenzene. Report of 348 cases caused by this fungicide. JAMA 183:88-91 (1963).
101. Dogramaci I. Porphyrias and porphyrin metabolism with special reference to porphyria in childhood. Adv Pediatr 13:11-63 (1964).
102. Peters HA, Johnson SAM, Cam S, Oral S, Muftu Y, Ergene T. Hexachlorobenzene-induced porphyria:effect of chelation on the disease, porphyrin and metal metabolism. Am J Med Sci 251:314-322 (1966).
103. Peters HA, Gocmen A, Cripps DJ, Bryan GT, Dogramaci I. Epidemiology of hexachlorobenzene porphyria in Turkey: clinical and laboratory follow-up after 25 years. Arch Neurol 39:744-749 (1982).
104. Gocmen A, Peters HA, Cripps DJ, Morris CR, Dogramaci I. Porphyria turcica: hexachlorobenzene-induced porphyria. In: Hexachlorobenzene: Proceedings of an International Symposium (Morris CR, Cabral JRP, eds). IARC Scientific Publications No 77, Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1986;567-573.
105. Peters HA, Cripps DJ, Gocmen A, Erturk E, Bryan GT, Morris CR. Neurotoxicity of hexachlorobenzene-induced porphyria turcica. In: Hexachlorobenzene: Proceedings of an International Symposium (Morris CR, Cabral JRP, eds). IARC Scientific Publications No 77, Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1986;575-579.
106. Peters H, Cripps D, Gocmen A, Bryan G, Erturk E, Morris C. Turkish epidemic hexachlorobenzene porphyria: a 30-year study. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:183-190 (1987).
107. Ockner RK, Schmid R. Acquired porphyria in man and rat due to hexachlorobenzene intoxication. Nature 189:499 (1961).
108. Elder GH, Evans JO, Matlin S. The porphyrinogenic action of polychlorinated hydrocarbons. In: Porphyrins in Human Diseases: First International Porphyrin Meeting (Doss M, ed). New York:S Karger, 1976;424-431.
109. San Martin de Viale LC, Rios de Molina MdC, Wainstok de Calmanovici R, Tomio JM. Experimental porphyria induced in rats by hexachlorobenzene: studies on the stepwise decarboxylation of uroporphyrinogen and phyriaporphyrinogen in vivo and in vitro in several tissues. In: Porphyrins in Human Diseases: First International Porphyrin Meeting (Doss M, ed). New York:S Karger, 1976;445-452.
110. de Matteis F. Experimental hepatic porphyria caused by hexachlorobenzene: mechanism of the metabolic block. In: Hexachlorobenzene: Proceedings of an International Symposium (Morris CR, Cabral JRP, eds). IARC Scientific Publications No 77, Lyon:International Agency for Research in Cancer, 1986;427-431.
111. Strik JJTWA. Subacute toxicity of hexachlorobenzene. In: Hexachlorobenzene: Proceedings of an International Symposium (Morris CR, Cabral JRP, eds). IARC Scientific Publications No 77, Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1986;335-342.
112. Goldstein JA, Hickman P, Bergman H, Vos JG. Hepatic porphyria induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the mouse. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 6:919-928 (1973).
113. Goldstein JA, Linko P, Bergman H. Induction of porphyria in the rat by chronic versus acute exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Biochem Pharmacol 31:1607-1613 (1982).
114. Bleiberg J, Wallen M, Brodkin R, Appelbaum IL. Industrially acquired porphyria. Arch Dermatol 89:793-797 (1964).
115. Pazderova-Vejlupkova J, Nemcova M, Pickova J, Jirasek L, Lukas E. The development and prognosis of chronic intoxication by tetrachlordibenzo-p-dioxin in men. Arch Environ Health 36:5-11 (1981).
116. Hope W, Lischwe D, Russell W, Weiss S. Porphyria cutanea tarda and sarcoma in a worker exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin--Missouri. MMWR 33:113-114 (1984).
117. McConnell R, Anderson K, Russell W, Anderson KE, Clapp R, Silbergeld EK, Landrigan PJ. Angiosarcoma, porphyria cutanea tarda, and probable chloracne in a worker exposed to waste oil contaminated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Br J Ind Med 50:699-703 (1993).
118. Poland AP, Smith D, Metter G, Possick P. A health survey of workers in a 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T plant; with special attention to chloracne, porphyria cutanea tarda, and psychologic parameters. Arch Environ Health 22:316-327 (1971).
119. Calvert GM, Sweeney MH, Fingerhut MA, Hornung RW, Halperin WE. Evaluation of porphyria cutanea tarda in U.S. workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Am J Ind Med 25:559-571 (1994).
120. Moses M, Lilis R, Crow KD, Thornton J, Fischbein A, Anderson HA, Selikoff IJ. Health status of workers with past exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the manufacture of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid: comparison of findings with and without chloracne. Am J Ind Med 5:161-182 (1984).
121. Doss M, Sauer H, von Tiepermann R, Colombi AM. Development of chronic hepatic porphyria (porphyria cutanea tarda) with inherited uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase deficiency under exposure to dioxin. Int J Biochem 16:369-373 (1984).
122. Centen AHJ, Strik JJTWA, Colombi A. Coproporphyrinuria and chronic hepatic porphyria type A found in people from Seveso (Italy) exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). In: Chemical Porphyria in Man (Strik JJTWA, Koeman JH, eds). Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1979;75-81.
123. Caputo R, Monti M, Ermacora E, Carminati G, Gelmetti C, Gianotti R, Gianni E, Puccinelli V. Cutaneous manifestations of tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Dermatol 19:812-819 (1988).
124. Caputo R. [Reply to letter]. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:1321 (1989).
125. Hoffman RE, Stehr-Green PA, Webb KB, Evans RG, Knutsen AP, Schramm WF, Staake JL, Gibson BB, Steinberg KK. Health effects of long-term exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. JAMA 255:2031-2038 (1986).
126. Webb K, Evans RG, Stehr P, Ayres SM. Pilot study on health effects of environmental 2,3,7,8-TCDD in Missouri. Am J Ind Med 11:685-691 (1987).
127. Haberman HF, Rosenberg F, Menon IA. Porphyria cutanea tarda: comparison of cases precipitated by alcohol and estrogens. Can Med Assoc J 113:653-655 (1975).
128. Lynch RE, Lee GR, Kushner JP. Porphyria cutanea tarda associated with disinfectant misuse. Arch Intern Med 135:549-552 (1975).
129. Chalmers JNM, Gillam AE, Kench JE. Porphyrinuria in a case of industrial methyl chloride poisoning. Lancet 28:806-808 (1940).
130. Doss M, Lange CE, Veltman G. Vinyl chloride-induced hepatic coproporphyrinuria with transition to chronic hepatic porphyria. Klin Wochenschr 62:175-178 (1984).
131. Strik JJTWA, Doss M, Schraa G, Robertson LW, von Tiepermann R, Harmsen EGM. Coproporphyrinuria and chronic hepatic porphyria type A found in farm families from Michigan (USA) exposed to polybrominated biphenyls (PBB). In: Chemical Porphyria in Man (Strik JJTWA, Koeman JH, eds). Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1979;29-53.
132. Seki Y, Kawanishi S, Sano S. Mechanism of PCB-induced porphyria and Yusho disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:222-234 (1987).
133. Strik JJTWA, Kip H, Yoshimura T, Masuda Y, Harmsen EGM. Porphyrins in urine of Yusho patients. In: Chemical Porphyria in Man (Strik JJTWA, Koeman JH, eds). Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1979;63-68.
134. Nonaka S, Shimoyoma T, Honda T, Yoshida H. Analysis of urinary porphyrins in polychlorinated biphenyl poisoning (Yusho) patients. In: Chemical Porphyria in Man (Strik JJTWA, Koeman JH, eds). Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1979;69-73.
135. Nagelsmit A, van Vliet PW, van der Wiel-Wetzels WAM, Wielard MJ, Strik JJTWA, Ottevanger CF, van Sittert NJ. Porphyrins as possible parameters for exposure to hexachlorocyclopentadiene, allylchloride, epichlorohydrin and endrin. In: Chemical Porphyria in Man (Strik JJTWA, Koeman JH, eds). Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1979;55-61.
136. Rossi E, Costin KA, Garcia-Webb P. Effect of occupational lead exposure on lymphocyte enzymes involved in heme biosynthesis. Clin Chem 36:1980-1983 (1990).
137. Simons TJ. The affinity of human erythrocyte porphobilinogen synthase for Zn2+ and Pb2+. Eur J Biochem 234:178-183 (1995).
138. Wetmur JG, Kaya AH, Plewinska M, Desnick RJ. Molecular
characterization of the human -aminolevulinate
dehydratase 2 (ALAD2) allele: implications for molecular screening of individuals
for genetic susceptibility to lead poisoning. Am J Hum Genet 49:757-763
(1991).
139. Battistuzzi G, Petrucci R, Silvagni L, Urbani FR,
Caiola S. -aminolevulinate dehydrase:
a new genetic polymorphism in man. Ann Hum Genet 45:223-229 (1981).
140. Petrucci R, Leonardi A, Battistuzzi G. The genetic polymorphism of d-aminolevulinate dehydrase in Italy. Hum Genet 60:289-290 (1982).
141. Benkmann HG, Bogdanski P, Goedde HW. Polymorphism of delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase in various populations. Hum Hered 33:62-64 (1983).
142. Ziemson B, Angerer J, Lehnert G, Benkmann HG, Goedde HW. Polymorphism of delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase in lead-exposed workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 58:245-247 (1986).
143. Astrin KH, Bishop DF, Wetmur JG, Kaul B, Davidow
B, Desnick RJ. -aminolevulinic acid dehydratase
isozymes and lead toxicity. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:23-29 (1987).
144. Wetmur JG, Lehnert G, Desnick RJ. The delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase polymorphism: higher blood lead levels in lead workers and environmentally exposed children with the 1-2 and 2-2 isozymes. Environ Res 56:109-119 (1991).
145. Smith CM, Wang X, Hu H, Kelsey KT. A polymorphism in the delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase gene may modify the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of lead. Environ Health Perspect 103:248-253 (1995).
146. Wetmur JG. Influence of the common human delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase polymorphism on lead body burden. Environ Health Perspect 102(Suppl 3):215-219 (1994).
147. Schwartz BS, Lee BK, Stewart W, Ahn KD, Springer K, Kelsey K. Associations of delta-aminolevulinic dehydratase genotype with plant, exposure duration, and blood lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels in Korean lead workers. Am J Epidemiol 142:738-745 (1995).
148. Doss M, von Tiepermann R. Urinary porphyrin profiles in acute lead poisoning: relation to differentiation from acute intermittent porphyria. In: Diagnosis and Therapy of Porphyrias and Lead Intoxication (Doss M, ed). New York:Springer-Verlag, 1978;178-184.
149. Doss M, Laubenthal F, Stoeppler M. Lead poisoning
in inherited -aminolevulinic acid dehydratase
deficiency. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 54:55-63 (1984).
150. Batlle AMdC, Fukuda H, Parera VE, Wider E, Stella AM. In inherited porphyrias, lead intoxication is a toxogenetic disorder. Int J Biochem 19:717-720 (1987).
151. Moore MR, Goldberg A, Yeung-Laiwah AAC. Lead effects on the heme biosynthetic pathway: relationship to toxicity. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:191-203 (1987).
152. Silbergeld EK. Role of altered heme synthesis in chemical injury to the nervous system. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:297-308 (1987).
153. Ishida N, Fujita H, Fukuda Y, Noguchi T, Doss M,
Kappas A, Sassa S. Cloning and expression of the defective genes from a
patient with -aminolevulinate dehydratase
porphyria. J Clin Invest 89:1431-1437 (1992).
154. Doss M, Muller WA. Acute lead poisoning in inherited
porphobilinogen synthase (-aminolevulinic acid
dehydrase) deficiency. Blut 45:131-139 (1982).
155. Dyer J, Garrick DP, Inglis A, Pye IF. Plumboporphyria (ALAD deficiency) in a lead worker: a scenario for potential diagnostic confusion. Br J Ind Med 50:1119-1121 (1993).
156. Thunell S, Holmberg L, Lundgren J. Aminolaevulinate dehydratase porphyria in infancy: a clinical and biochemical study. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 25:5-14 (1987).
157. Goldwater LJ, Joselow MM. Absorption and excretion of mercury in man. XIII: Effects of mercury exposure on urinary excretion of coproporphyrin and delta-aminolevulinic acid. Arch Environ Health 15:327-331 (1967).
158. Telolahy P, Javelaud B, Cluet J, de Ceaurriz J, Boudene C. Urinary excretion of porphyrins by smelter workers chronically exposed to arsenic dust. Toxicol Lett 66:89-95 (1993).
159. Garcia-Vargas GG, Garcia-Rangel A, Aguilar-Romo M, Garcia-Salcedo J, del Razo LM, Ostrosky-Wegman P, de Nava CC, Cebrian ME. A pilot study on the urinary excretion of porphyrins in human populations chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Hum Exp Toxicol 10:189-193 (1991).
160. Downey D. Porphyria induced by palladium-copper dental prostheses: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 67:5-6 (1992).
161. Fowler BA, Oskarsson A, Woods JS. Metal- and metalloid-induced porphyrinurias: relationships to cell injury. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:172-182 (1987).
162. Bleakley P, Nichol AW, Collins AG. Diazinon and porphyria cutanea tarda. Med J Aust 1:314-315 (1979).
163. Tenhunen R, Savolainen H, Jappinen P. Changes in haem synthesis associated with occupational exposure to organic and inorganic sulphides. Clin Sci 64:187-191 (1983).
164. Peters HA, Cripps DJ, Reese HH. Porphyria: theories of etiology and treatment. Int Rev Neurobiol 16:301-355 (1974).
165. Silbergeld EK. Porphyrins as indicators of chemical injury and exposure. Ann NY Acad Sci 514:170-171 (1987).
166. Downey DC. Fatigue syndromes: new thoughts and reinterpretation of previous data. Med Hypotheses 39:185-190 (1992).
167. Downey DC. Fatigue syndromes revisited: the possible role of porphyrins. Med Hypotheses 42:285-290 (1994).
168. Downey DC. Hereditary coproporphyria. Br J Clin Pract 48:97-99 (1994).
169. Ziem G, Donnay A. Note with regard to the differential diagnosis of porphyrias and multiple chemical sensitivity. Baltimore:MOS Referral & Resources, December 1995.
170. Donnay A. Porphyria testing suggested for Gulf War veterans. In: Our Toxic Times, Vol 5. White Sulfur Springs, MT:Chemical Injury Information Network, December 1994;1,3.
171. Donnay A, Ziem G. Protocol for evaluating disorders of porphyrin metabolism in chemically sensitive patients. Baltimore:MCS Referral & Resources, March 1995.
172. Morton WE. Redefinition of abnormal susceptibility to environmental chemicals. In: Hazardous Waste: Impacts on Human and Ecological Health (Johnson BL, Xintaras C, Andrews JS Jr, eds). Princeton, NJ:Princeton Scientific Publishing, 1996;320-327.
173. Morton W. Chronic porphyrias' role in MCS. In: Our Toxic Times, Vol 6. White Sulfur Springs, MT:Chemical Injury Information Network, August 1995;22-24.
174. Duehring C. Porphyria and chronic fatigue. In: Our Toxic Times, Vol 6. White Sulfur Springs, MT:Chemical Injury Information Network, August 1995;17,19.
175. Duehring C. Environmental Access Profile: Porphyrinogenic chemicals and metabolism: MCS patients at risk. In: Our Toxic Times, Vol 6. White Sulfur Springs, MT:Chemical Injury Information Network, November 1995;9-11.
176. Duehring C. Environmental Access Profile: Porphyrinogenic pesticides: Toxic to all living things. In: Our Toxic Times, Vol 6. White Sulfur Springs, MT:Chemical Injury Information Network, December 1995;13,14.
177. Ziem G, McTamney J. Profile of patients with chemical injury and sensitivity. Environ Health Perspect Suppl (in press).
178. Sparks PJ, Daniell W, Black DW, Kipen HM, Altman LC, Simon GE, Terr AI. Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. I, Case definition, theories of pathogenesis, and research needs. J Occup Med 36:718-730 (1994).
179. Sparks PJ, Daniell W, Black DW, Kipen HM, Altman LC, Simon GE, Terr AI. Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome: a clinical perspective. II, Evaluation, diagnostic testing, treatment, and social considerations. J Occup Med 36:731-737 (1994).
180. Daniell WE, Sparks PJ. Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome. In: Environmental Respiratory Diseases (Cordasco EM Sr, Demeter SL, Zenz C, eds). New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1995;391-417.
181. Cullen MR. The worker with multiple chemical sensitivities: an overview. Occup Med 2:655-661 (1987).
182. Simon GE, Daniell W, Stockbridge H, Claypoole K, Rosenstock L. Immunologic, psychological, and neuropsychological factors in multiple chemical sensitivity: a controlled study. Ann Intern Med 119:97-103 (1993).
183. Leavelle DE, ed. Mayo Medical Laboratories Interpretive Handbook: Interpretive Data for Diagnostic Laboratory Tests. Rochester, MN:Mayo Medical Laboratories, 1994.
184. Barnett RN. Normal values. In: Clinical Laboratory Statistics, 2nd ed. Boston:Little, Brown and Company, 1979;77-90.
185. Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 299:926-930 (1978).
186. Charrow J, Hedges LV. When is a test result abnormal? Defining limits and risks. Am J Dis Child 144:245-250 (1990).
187. Richardson-Jones A, Twedt D, Gibson M, Fimlt NZ, Hellman R. Continuum analysis method applied to blood count reference intervals. Ann Clin Lab Sci 23:340-349 (1993).
188. Bottomley SS, Bonkowsky HL, Kreimer-Birnbaum M. The diagnosis of acute intermittent porphyria: usefulness and limitations of the erythrocyte uroporphyrinogen I synthase assay. Am J Clin Pathol 76:133-139 (1981).
189. Tefferi A, Colgan JP, Solberg LA Jr. Acute porphyrias: diagnosis and management. Mayo Clin Proc 69:991-995 (1994).
190. Peterson LR, Hamernyik P, Bird TD, Labbe RF. Erythrocyte uroporphyrinogen I synthase activity in diagnosis of acute intermittent porphyria. Clin Chem 22:1835-1840 (1976).
191. McColl KEL, Moore MR, Thompson GG, Goldberg A. Screening
for latent acute intermittent porphyria: the value of measuring both leucocyte -aminolaevulinic
acid synthase and erythrocyte uroporphyrinogen-1-synthase activities. J
Med Genet 19:271-276 (1982).
192. Grandchamp B, Nordmann Y. Coproporphyrinogen III oxidase assay. Enzyme 28:196-205 (1982).
193. Guo R, Lim CK, Peters TJ. Accurate and specific HPLC assay of coproporphyrinogen III oxidase activity in human peripheral leucocytes. Clin Chim Acta 177:245-252 (1988).
194. Rossi E, Garcia-Webb P, Costin KA. Letter: Lymphocytes are the preferred cells for the measurement of blood coproporphyrinogen oxidase activity. Clin Chim Acta 181:115-118 (1989).
195. Sano S, Granick S. Mitochondrial coproporphyrinogen oxidase and protoporphyrin formation. J Biol Chem 236:1173-1180 (1961).
196. Pasanen AVO, Eklof M, Tenhunen R. Coproporphyrinogen oxidase activity and porphyrin concentrations in peripheral red blood cells in hereditary sideroblastic anaemia. Scand J Haematol 34:235-237 (1985).
Last Update: April 23, 1997